giuliani-wtc-collapse http://www.baltech.org/lederman/giuliani-wtc-collapse-3-01-02.html Topic: Could the collapse of WTC and other buildings have been a nuclear attack? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- that pit was "smoking" hot for a ridiculously long time .... the temps were extremely high. 2- explosions would have happened in the upper floors if you believe the jet fuel theory. (there is not enough fuel in the jet to melt that much steel in the bottom floors) 3- the rubble was quicly hauled away. (without forensic examination) 4- has anyone heard any rumours about the firemen experiencing any gulf war type syndromes?? Could it be possible, possible mind you, that the attacks on New York City, Washington D.C., and the aborted attack foiled by the courageous actions of the passengers and crew of Flight 93, were only a diversion to what were bomb and even missile attacks? At risk of being labeled some kind of "conspiracy wacko" I am bringing these questions to public forum. Consider this information: http://www.americanfreepress.net/07_14_02/Unexplained_9-11_/unexplained_9-11_.html Unexplained 9-11 Explosion at WTC Complex - Despite the fact that the horrible events of Sept. 11 occurred in broad daylight and were widely photographed, significant aspects of the attacks have been completely suppressed by a media blackout. A massive explosion, witnessed by millions of television viewers on CNN, evidently devastated World Trade Center 6, the eight-story U.S. Customs building, although no national newspaper, other than American Free Press, has written a word about it. Before the smoke had cleared from around the stricken South Tower, a mysterious explosion shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6. The unexplained blast occurred between the burning North Tower and the 47-story Salomon Brothers Building, known as WTC 7, immediately after United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower, at about 9:03 a.m. The explosion at WTC 6 was shown afterward on CNN. But because it was not broadcast as it happened there has been some confusion about when it actually occurred. The large amount of smoke seen cascading around the South Tower in the video led some observers to mistake the blast for a dust cloud from the subsequent collapse of the tower... http://www.americanfreepress.net/07_14_02/Unexplained_9-11_/unexplained_9-11_.html There is a great deal more information in the entire article. Then, when you have digested that information, consider this: http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic_.html NEW SEISMIC DATA REFUTES OFFICIAL EXPLANATION Two unexplained "spikes" in the seismic record from Sept. 11 indicate huge bursts of energy shook the ground beneath the World Trade Center’s twin towers immediately prior to the collapse. American Free Press has learned of pools of "molten steel" found at the base of the collapsed twin towers weeks after the collapse. Although the energy source for these incredibly hot areas has yet to be explained, New York seismometers recorded huge bursts of energy, which caused unexplained seismic "spikes" at the beginning of each collapse. These spikes suggest that massive underground explosions may have literally knocked the towers off their foundations, causing them to collapse... SEISMIC ‘SPIKES’ Seismographs at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of the WTC, recorded strange seismic activity on Sept. 11 that has still not been explained. While the aircraft crashes caused minimal earth shaking, significant earthquakes with unusual spikes occurred at the beginning of each collapse. The Palisades seismic data recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake during the 10-second collapse of the South Tower at 9:59:04 and a 2.3 quake during the 8-second collapse of the North Tower at 10:28:31. However, the Palisades seismic record shows that—as the collapses began—a huge seismic "spike" marked the moment the greatest energy went into the ground. The strongest jolts were all registered at the beginning of the collapses, well before the falling debris struck the Earth. These unexplained "spikes" in the seismic data lend credence to the theory that massive explosions at the base of the towers caused the collapses. A "sharp spike of short duration" is how seismologist Thorne Lay of University of California at Santa Cruz told AFP an underground nuclear explosion appears on a seismograph... http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic_.html But, we're not glowing yet. Effects of the Neutron Bomb: could it be possible for such a device to be planted deep in the earth, explode, destroy the support towers to a structure such as the WTC towers, and by the time the temperature cools enough, and the rubble has been cleared, to show no sign of residual radiation? Just speculating. Neutron bombs are designed to MINIMIZE damage and MAXIMIZE casualties. It's use would be to detonate it over a city, and still have the city intact, but everyone dead. http://www.baltech.org/lederman/giuliani-wtc-collapse-3-01-02.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is getting too weird. now confirmed by Federal investigators [see NY Times article below], the collapse of #7 WTC was caused by thousands of gallons of diesel fuel illegally stored in the building by former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. Was this incredibly dumb move an accident, an oversight or part of a specific plan to eliminate incriminating evidence? The NY Times article notes that the cause of the collapse was very similar to that which brought down the Federal building in Oklahoma City. The similarities go much further than the interactions between diesel fuel, the laws of physics and the strength of structural steel. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The "independent" NY Times is at war with any/all conservatives.Their practice of bending facts of any kind is a conspiracy in itself. It seems like a massive explosion in the basement or sublevel of the WTC would produce a profound puff at the base,or ground level.There was a documentary a week ago on Public Broadcasting(TV).They showed many photographs detailing the WTC collapsing.Their engineering experts say the structure was weakened by the intensive heat of the fire,causing the collapse.Who is right on the collapse ? Theories will abound. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- that pit was "smoking" hot for a ridiculously long time .... the temps were extremely high. 2- explosions would have happened in the upper floors if you believe the jet fuel theory. (there is not enough fuel in the jet to melt that much steel in the bottom floors) 3- the rubble was quicly hauled away. (without forensic examination) 4- has anyone heard any rumours about the firemen experiencing any gulf war type syndromes?? cyberexpose.net